Samsung 4K TV Comparison Sony 4K TV Comparison Technology

Sony X900F vs Samsung Q7FN Review (XBR55X900F vs QN55Q7FN, XBR65X900F vs QN65Q7F, XBR75X900F vs QN75Q7FN)

Samsung Q7FN Review

Samsung Q7FN and Sony X900F are middle to higher model of 4K HDR LED TV which available in the market.  Q7FN is the successor of Q7F and also the flat model of Samsung QLED TV 7 series or the third top model of Samsung’s 2018 QLED TV lineup. Meanwhile, Sony X900F is the successor of X900E, the second-top model of Sony’s 2017 4K HDR TV lineup. But in 2018, for a while, Sony doesn’t yet launch the successor of X930E/X940E as the top model of Sony LED TV lineup in last year, so for this time, Sony X900F is the top model of Sony’s 2018 4K HDR LED TV. In the market, Samsung Q7FN only comes in 3 screen sizes options including 55 inch (QN55Q7FN), 65 Inch (QN65Q7FN), and 75 Inch (QN75Q7FN), while X900F comes in more screen sizes options including 49 Inch (XBR49X900F), 55 Inch (XBR55X900F), 65 Inch (XBR65X900F), 75 inch (XBR75X900F), and 85 inch (XBR85X900F). For their 55 inch and 65 inch size, (XBR55X900F vs QN55Q7FN, XBR65X900F vs QN65Q7FN), Samsung Q7FN is sold hundreds dollar more expensive than Sony X900F, while for 75 inch (XBR75X900F vs QN75Q7FN), their price is almost similar. But even so, their prices certainly are not fixed and could still change at any time. So, which is a better choice between them?

Samsung Q7FN vs Sony X900F Key Specs

Specs and Features Samsung Q7FN Sony X900F
Resolution 4K (2160×3840) 4K (2160×3840)
Sizes Available 55 Inch (QN55Q7FN), 65 Inch (QN65Q7FN), 75 Inch (QN65Q7FN) 49 Inch (XBR49X900F), 55 Inch (XBR55X900F), 65 Inch (XBR65X900F), 75 Inch (XBR75X900F), 85 Inch (XBR85X900F)
Panel Technology VA Panel VA Panel
Screen Type Flat Flat
Backlighting Technology Edge Lit LED Direct Led
Local Dimming Yes (Q Contrast PLus) Yes (Full Array Local Dimming)
Picture Engine Q Engine X1 Extreme
HDR Formats HDR10, HLG, HDR10+ HDR 10, HLG, Dolby Vision
Color Technology Quantum Dot with Q COlor TriLuminos Display, Live Color Technology, Precision Color Mapping, Super Bit Mapping 4K HDR
Support 10 Bit Yes Yes
Contrast Enhancement Contrast Enhancer, Supreme UHD Dimming, Ultra Black Elite Dynamic Contrast Enhancer, Object-Based HDR Remastering, X-Tended Dynamic Range Pro 6X
Clarity Enhancement UHD Up-scaling Engine 4K X-Reality Pro, Dual Data Base Processing
Motion Technology Motion Rate 240 Motion Flow XR960
Native Refresh rate Panel 120 Hz 120 Hz
Smart TV Tizen 2018 Android
Processor Quad Core Information Not Provided
Remote Samsung Smart Remote Sony Smart Remote
HDMI 4 4
USB 3 3
Audio Channel 4.2 2
Speaker Type Front Firing Front Firing
Sound Output 40 Watts 20 watts
Price See the price on Amazon See the price on Amazon

Short Review of Samsung Q7FN

As we have mentioned above, Samsung Q7FN is the successor of Q7F, the flat model of Samsung’s 2017 QLED TV 7 Series. As a part of Samsung’s QLED TV lineup, metal quantum dot technology becomes the mainstay technology of Q7FN. With this technology, it can deliver excellent wide color gamut, close to 100% of DCI P3 color space that certainly makes its color reproduction is awesome. Still like the predecessor, on its panel, Samsung Q7FN still uses VA panel with edge lit LED backlight and local dimming technology. The use of VA panel with edge lit local dimming makes Q7FN has excellent black level and fairly bright peak brightness, but on the other hand, this also makes its side viewing angle coverage is limited.

Samsung Q COlor

Meanwhile, like other models of Samsung’s 2018 4K TV lineup, Q7FN is also still focused on HDR, even in this year, it comes with a new HDR formats called “HDR10+”. Essentially, this format is based on standard HDR 10 format, but there is an improvement on how the metadata for remapping brightness and color is sent. As we know, for remapping brightness and colors, HDR 10 uses static metadata where it is sent at the first of the contents. Meanwhile, HDR10+ uses dynamic metadata where it is sent scene by scene, makes color and brightness that remapped at each scene is more precise than standard HDR10. And for maximizing its performance when processing HDR contents, Samsung Q7FN is powered by the number of Samsung’s advanced technology like Q Engine, Supreme UHD Dimming, Contrast Enhancer, Q Elite Black, Q Color, and others.

For maximizing its performance when playing fast moving images like sports, fast games or fast movies, Samsung Q7FN is supported by Motion Rate 240 technology based on native 120 Hz refresh rate panel. Combined to its excellent pixel response time, makes the picture displayed on its screen looks very smooth and clear with almost no motion blur. The other good points offered by Q7FN is about its low input lags where with lower than 20 ms of input lags at any resolution, this certainly is low enough to play any games even for fast paced games so feels responsively. Additionally, for allowing you to enjoy HDR contents with impressive sound experience, it is equipped with 4.2 channels speaker system with 40 watts of total sound outputs. And as smart TV platform, Q7FN is featuring Tizen 2018 that powered by a quad core processor. The excellence, started at this year, Tizen OS has been integrated with Samsung’s Bixby Voice Assistant that makes its voice navigation can do a lot of more and Samsung Home Intelligence App called “Smart Thing”.

>> Please click here to see the price of Samsung Q7FN on Amazon <<

Short Review of Sony X900F

Sony X900F Review

For this time, Sony X900F is the top model of Sony’s 2018 HDR 4K LED TV lineup. It is actually is the successor of X900E, the second top model of Sony’s 2017 4K HDR TV lineup, but since X930 series as the top model has not been released, for a while, it becomes the top model of Sony’s 2018 LED TV lineup. Compared the predecessor X900E, it brings some improvements on technologies and features that certainly makes its picture quality and performance is better than the predecessor. One of the major improvements offered, now X900F is already powered by X1 Extreme engine in lieu of X1 engine. With this picture engine, this doesn’t just make X900F can deliver better HDR picture than the predecessor X900E, but it also makes X900F already supports Dolby Vision. If Samsung Q7FN has HDR10+ as its HDR format with dynamic metadata, Sony X900F has Dolby Vision that also uses dynamic metadata. The other advanced technology offered by X900F is about its panel. Like the predecessor, Sony X900F also use VA panel with direct LED backlight and Full Array Local Dimming. But for this case, it has more local dimming zones than the predecessor that makes its local dimming performance is better than the predecessor. One of the impacts that caused, it can produce deeper black level than the predecessor X900E. The other improvement offered by X900F, now it comes with X-Motion Clarity as the instead of Motion Flow XR960 as its motion enhancement technology. Both of these technologies use different method in minimizing blur, but essentially, they are equally based on native 120 Hz refresh rate panel.

The excepting of what mentioned above as the major improvements offered by Sony X900F than the predecessor, the other technologies and features offered by X900F tends to be similar to the predecessor. For delivering very accurate color, it is powered by TriLuminos Display technology that maximized by Precision Color Mapping and Live Color Technology. Additionally, for delivering smooth color gradient, X900F is also powered by Super Bit Mapping 4K HDR technology as a part of X1 Extreme Engine. Not just that, there are also Dual Data Base Processing and Object Based HDR Remaster technology as its picture clarity enhancement technology. For maximizing its brightness, it is powered by X-Tended Dynamic Range Pro 6X that allow X900F can deliver bright peak brightness.

As its smart TV platform, like the predecessor, Sony X900F is still featuring Google Android TV version 7.0 as its smart TV platform. In this version, Google Android TV has supported Google Voice Assistant and Home Assistant. Not even just that, it also already support Amazon Alexa Home Assistant app, allows you to control some other compatible devices via your TV. A bit unfortunate, it is only equipped with standard 2.0 channel speaker system with 20 watts of sound output, so to enjoy HDR entertainment with impressive sound experience, you should by an additional sound bar or sound system separately.

>> Please click here to see the price of Sony X900F on Amazon <<

Sony X900F vs Samsung Q7FN Performance

Picture Quality

Contrast and Black Level

Essentially, both Samsung Q7FN and Sony X900F has excellent native contrast ratio. Both of them equally have more than 5000:1 of native contrast ratio, makes both of them can produce deep black level. And combined to their excellent black uniformity, this certainly makes both of them can produce excellent dark scene, even when they are set in a dark environment. As we know, the impact of native contrast ratio in a dark room is very sensitive where to show blacks so looks really black, this need high native contrast ratio. The low contrast ratio will make black tend to look grey. On the other hand, black level produced by both Sony X900F and Samsung Q7FN is also dark enough to show shadow details of HDR images like the intended. With darker than 0.02 nits of black level, it is dark enough to reveal more information in dark scene of HDR images like the content creator intended. The result, dark scene of HDR images displayed on their screen looks excellent, makes both [of them as a great TV when used for watching HDR movies with a lot of dark scenes like Horror or Thriller. Meanwhile compared between them, their difference is actually is not far different. But for this case, the local dimming of X900F works more effective than Q7FN in improving the contrast. With local dimming not activated or set to low, native contrast ratio of Q7FN might be a bit stronger than X900F but otherwise, when local dimming is activated, X900F has a bit stronger native contrast ratio than Q7FN. But as mentioned, whether their local diming is activated or not, their native contrast ratio is not too far different.

Winner: Sony X900F (with local dimming activated)

Peak Brightness

In addition to their excellent black level and contrast, both Sony X900F and Samsung Q7FN also equally have excellent peak brightness and essentially, their peak brightness is bright enough to fight the glare of ambient light. Additionally, both X900F and Q7FN also equally have good reflection handling. Combination of bright peak brightness and good reflection handling makes the picture displayed on their screen will look remain amazing though they set in a bright room with a lot of ambient light. This means, if you often watch TV in a bright room, both of them might be a good choice for you.

Meanwhile, compare between them, which one brighter is depending on the source. Overall, when the source is SDR contents, Samsung Q7FN has a bit brighter peak brightness while when the source is HDR contents, peak brightness of Sony X900F is brighter. Nevertheless, although X900F has brighter peak brightness when playing HDR contents, but for a short time, peak brightness of Q7FN is actually far brighter, even far brighter than 1000 nits, particularly on small window size. At times, this allows Q7FN can show a dramatic highlight of HDR images within the 1000-4000 nits of brightness range like the intended for a short time. On the other hand, since the peak brightness of X900F is still lower than 1000 nits, even for a short time, this TV cannot show a highlight of HDR images brighter than 1000 nits like what recommended by UHD Alliance. Meanwhile, for a short time, Samsung Q7FN might be able to show far brighter highlight of HDR images than X900F. But since its local dimming doesn’t work as well as X900F, the unwanted adjacent lights around the small bright object or called “blooming” will be a bit more visible on the screen of Q7FN than X900F.

Winner: Sony X900F

Color Reproduction

One of the main advantage offered by Samsung Q7FN as a part of Samsung QLED TV is about its color gamut and color volume. With metal quantum dot technology, color gamut produced can cover nearly 100% of DCI P3 color space, makes almost all colors of HDR images which mastered in DCI P3 can be shown fairly saturated, even for dark greens where most of modern TV struggle to show this color fairly saturated. And combined to its excellent color volume, this certainly makes all colors of HDR images at almost its entire brightness range can be shown very accurate. A bit unfortunate, it cannot produce extremely dark colors as good as brighter color due the limitation performance of its local dimming technology. On the other hand, although not as excellent as Q7FN, color gamut produced by Sony X900F also can fairly good cover most of colors in DCI P3, makes colors of HDR images mastered in DCI P3 like HDR 10 images can be shown fairly accurate. Additionally, its Rec.2020 color coverage also can be said well, make colors of HDR images mastered in Rec.2020 like Dolby Vision images also can be shown fairly accurate. Meanwhile, although its color volume is also not as good as Q7F, but its color volume is only limited by its own color gamut. This means, it can show its wide color gamut at its entire brightness range, even darker colors also can be shown as saturated as brighter colors.

While the color gamut and color volume of Samsung Q7FN is superior, Sony X900F can show better color gradient. With Super Bit Mapping 4K HDR technology, Sony X900F can process 10 bit contents excellently. The result, color gradient of 10 bit videos looks very smooth without any major color banding is visible. On the other hand, color gradient of Q7FN is not as good as X900F. When playing 10bit contents, some faint bandings are visible almost everywhere, especially at blue and dark green. Fortunately, most people don’t notice this much, so this should not be a problem for normal usage.

Winner:  Samsung Q7FN

Side Viewing Angle

Although both Samsung Q7FN and Sony X900F are including the high-end model of 2018 TV lineup, this doesn’t mean they don’t have a major problem. Like other TVs with VA panel, both of them also limited viewing angle coverage. This means, when viewed from the side, the picture displayed on their screen doesn’t look as good as when viewed from the front and center. Started at less than 20 degrees off center and front, color will shift and black level will degrade. And from the wider angle the picture viewed, the color shift and black level degradation will be more striking. Color accuracy is reduced while black will tend to look grey. Even at a bit wider angle, the brightness is also reduced. Essentially, the picture will look degraded when viewed from the side and the wider angle you watch from, the picture will look worse. If you do not want to lose the amazing picture quality displayed on their screen, the seating arrangement in such a way in your room is needed if you often watch TV with your family.

Winner: Draw (Equally bad)

Motion Handling and 24p Playback

Both Sony Q7FN and Sony X900F also equally has excellent motion handling when they are playing fast moving images like sports, fast movies or fast games. Although X900F actually has a bit lower pixel response time than Q7FN, but essentially, their pixel response time are equally excellent for minimizing motion blur of fast paced contents. The result, when they are playing fast moving object, there is only a short ghosting trail following fast moving object where for most people, they might not notice this much.  The blur that might visible is more caused by persistence than motion. Meanwhile, since both of them have local dimming technology, to dim the backlight, both of them equally use PWM Dimming System that might be able to cause flickers. For this case, they use different dimming frequency where Sony X900F uses 720 Hz of dimming frequency while Samsung Q7FN uses 240 Hz. But since X900F use higher frequency, this certainly makes flickers are less visible on its screen than on the screen of Q7FN.

Meanwhile, for reducing persistence blur so make motion looks clearer, particularly when playing 60 fps contents like sports or others, both of them have an Option BFI (Black Frame Insertion Mode) that flickers the screen at lower frequency, usually 120 Hz or 60 Hz. To activate the BFI mode, on Q7FN, you must set “Auto Motion Plus” to “Custom” and enable “LED Clear Motion” while on X900F, you must set “MotionFlow” to “Custom” and increase the “Clearness” Slider. The BFI mode of both is very effective to help motion looks clearer. But on the other hand, since they use lower dimming frequency, for people who sensitive to flickers, this certainly also makes flicker more visible. A bit advantage of Q7FN, it can flicker the screen at 60 Hz that helps 60fp contents like sports, video games looks clearer. On the other hand, X900F only can flickers at 120 Hz and cannot flickers the backlight at 60 Hz, so this will not help much to reduce the visible duplications in 60 Hz content. But even so, some people might prefer to no flicker, so this should not be problem for some people.

When playing 24p Movies, Sony X900F can do a bit better job than Samsung Q7FN, particularly when playing 24p movies via 60i signal. By making certain setting like set “MotionFlow” to “True Cinema” and set “CineMotion” to “High”, Sony X900F can show all source of movies smoothly and clearly with judder-free. This means no mater you are playing 24p videos like Blu-Ray or DVD Movies,  24p content via 60p signal like movies from streaming device, 24p contents via 60i signal like movies from satellite TV, or even 24p movies from native apps like Netflix, YouTube, Amazon Videos, you can enjoy them clearly smoothly without judder is visible.  On the other hand, the excepting of 24p contents via 60i signal, Samsung Q7FN also can show them clearly and smoothly. For removing judder on the screen of Q7FN, you must set “Auto Motion Plus” To “Custom” and both “Sliders” to “0”. The inability of Samsung Q7FN in removing judder at 24p contents via 60i signals actually is not an ordinary thing and usually, there is a firmware update in the future that will fix this issue. Additionally, most people might not sensitive to judder, so this should not also a serious issue that should be considered.

Winner: Sony X900F

Connectivity

Both Sony X900F and Samsung Q7FN are equally equipped with 4 HDMI ports as their major connectivity. All of their HDMI ports are equally support HDCP 2.2 and CEC. Meanwhile, on Q7FN, all of its HDMI ports also already support HDMI 2.0 full bandwidth while that support ARC (Audio Return Channel) is only HDMI 4. On the other hand, on X900F, not all its HDMI ports are support HDMI 2.0 full bandwidth. There are only HDMI 2 and 3 which support HDMI 2.0 while that support ARC is HDMI 3. Additionally, both of them are also equally equipped with 3 USB ports. The difference, all of USB ports of Q7FN are USB 2.0 while on X900F, 1 port (USB 1) is USB 3.0. In addition to USB and HDMI ports, both of them are also equally equipped with 1 RF In (Antenna In), 1 Ethernet In, and 1 Digital Audio Out (Optical). Both of them also equally don’t have Component In. A bit difference between them, X900F has 1 composite In, 1 Analog Digital Out (Mini Jack), and 1 IR in for IR Blaster, while Q7FN doesn’t have this connectivity. The other difference between them, all of the inputs/outputs of Sony X900F are located on the side/rear panel, while on Q7FN, most of them are installed on separated box called “One Connect Box”.

Talking about their input lags, Samsung Q7FN is superior to Sony X900F. No matter the resolution of the source, all of input lags of Q7FN under “Game Mode” and “PC mode” are lower than 20 ms that means this is great. The result, playing any games on Q7FN will feel very responsive without laggy, even for fast paced games that need fast response.  Meanwhile, the input lags of Sony X900F are depending on the resolution. When the source is 4K, although not as low as Q7FN, its input lags are still low enough for playing fast paced 4K games so feels responsively. But a bit unfortunate, its input lags at 1080p resolution is a bit too high and only low enough for playing casual full HD games while for fast paced games, this might be a bit disappointed.

Winner: Samsung Q7FN

Smart TV

Tizen OS vs Android TV 2017

As their smart TV platform, Samsung Q7FN is featuring Tizen 2018 that powered by a quad core processor while Sony X900F is featuring Google Android TV version 7.0. Like last year version, Tizen OS has intuitive layout with a “ribbon” at the bottom across the screen contains shortcuts to popular and favorite apps, menu setting and many more. Once a shortcut is highlighted, a pop window will appear above it contain advanced menu or recommendation contents. You can also organize the “ribbon” in accordance with your wishes. You can move the most popular or your favorite apps to the front while the apps that rarely to be used can be moved to the back. This makes the navigation feels easily. On the other hand, the layout of Google Android is also very attractive but quite crowded. However, since the preinstalled apps provided are a lot of, this makes the home screen is very long and to see everything, you need make a lot of scrolling. This certainly makes the navigation is not as easy as Tizen OS. Meanwhile, their performance is also equally not too consistent. When you launch an app, at certain times, it will open quickly with smooth animation, but at other certain time, there is a lag about one-two second before it open and the animation is choppy. Talking about apps provided, both of these smart TV OS have a lot of preinstalled apps. There are VoD service like YouTube, Amazon Videos, Netflix, and more, Web Browser, Cloud Games, Live TV, and many more. Both of them also have a Home Intelligence Assistant app and a Voice Assistant app. For this case, Tizen OS comes with “Smart Thing” as its Home intelligence system and “Bixby Voice Assistant as its voice assistant, while Android OS comes with Google Home Assistant supports Amazon Alexa and Google Voice Assistant. Both of these platforms also have an apps store where Android TV has Google Play Store while Tizen OS has Samsung apps store. But since “Google Play Store” is powered by many more developer, this certainly makes the apps, games, contents, and contents provided are also a lot of more than provided by Samsung’s apps Store.

As the controller, both Samsung Q7FN and Sony X900F are equally equipped with smart remote. However, the remote of Q7FN is small and only has few buttons. Otherwise, the remote of X900F is large and has a lot of button. Both of these remote also have ability for voice navigation. By the support of Samsung’s Bixby Voice assistant for Q7FN and Google Voice Assistant for X900F, both of these remote can do a lot of more with your voice commands. But for this case, voice command of Sony TV can do more commands than voice command of Samsung TV. Additionally, both of them also can be functioned as universal remote, allow you to control your other devices connected to X900F or Q7FN with a single remote. For this case, Samsung Remote works alone without additional equipment while for Sony Remote, it requires an IR Blaster. Fortunately, Sony includes it in its buying package, so you don’t need buy the IR Blaster separately.

Winner: X900F

>> Please click here to check the latest price of Samsung Q7FN on Amazon <<

>> Please click here to check the latest price of Sony X900F on Amazon <<

Summary

Performance Samsung Q7FN Sony X900F
Color Gamut (4.5/5) (4.0/5)
Contrast (4.5/5) (4.4/5)
Peak Brightness (4.3/5) (4.4/5)
HDR Performance (4.1/5) (4.3/5)
Viewing Angle (2.2/5) (2.5/5)
Motion Handling (4.3/5) (4.4/5)
Input Lag (4.6/5) (4.3/5)
UHD Up-scaling (4.4/5) (4.4/5)
Smart TV (3.9/5) (4/5)
Audio Performance (3.5/5) (3.1/5)

Conclusion

As we have discussed a lot above, essentially, both Samsung Q7FN and Sony X900F have excellent picture quality and great HDR performance. However, compare between them, each of them has advantages and disadvantages to the other.  In term of picture quality aspect, Sony X900F is a bit superior on black level and contrast produced, while Samsung Q7FN offer far better color gamut and color volume that certainly makes its color reproduction is also looks better. Nevertheless, color gradient deliver by Q7FN is not as smooth as X900F. In term of peak luminance, it is depending on the source. When the source is SDR, Q7FN has brighter peak brightness while when the source is HDR, peak brightness of X900F better. Nevertheless, although when playing HDR contents, overall, Sony X900F has brighter peak brightness, but its peak brightness is still below 1000 nits, it is not able to show the highlight of HDR images at 1000-4000 nits of brightness like the intended. On the other hand, although when playing HDR images, its peak brightness is not as bright as X900F, but for a short time, it can reach peak brightness far brighter than 1000 nits, even brighter than 1500 nits, particularly at small window size. This certainly makes Q7FN can show highlight HDR images at 1000-4000 nits like the creator intended. Meanwhile, the other advantage that offered by X900F is about its pixel response time and its ability in handling 24p movies, while the other advantage offered by Q7FN is about its input lags.

So, which one is a better choice between them? As we have mentioned, the excepting of 75 inch (XBR75X900F vs QN75Q7FN), with the same screen, Samsung Q7FN is sold more expensive than Sony X900F. But keep in mind, their price could still change at any time. Now, the decision comes back to you according to your preference like what we have discussed a lot above. But essentially, if your main consideration in buying TV is color performance, Samsung Q7FN certainly is a better choice. But if want a TV with deeper black level or brighter peak brightness, you can do with X900F.

>> Please click here to buy Samsung Q7FN on Amazon <<

>> Please click here to buy Samsung Q7FN on Amazon <<

jQuery.noConflict();

“use strict”;

//DOCUMENT.READY
jQuery(document).ready(function() {
//hide various jQuery elements until they are loaded
jQuery(‘.revolution-slider ul’).show();
jQuery(‘.it-widget-tabs’).show();
//revolution slider

if (jQuery.fn.cssOriginal!=undefined)
jQuery.fn.css = jQuery.fn.cssOriginal;

jQuery(‘.revolution-slider’).revolution(
{
delay:8000,
startheight:348,
startwidth:672,

hideThumbs:200,

thumbWidth:100,
thumbHeight:50,
thumbAmount:5,

navigationType:”none”,
navigationArrows:”solo”,
navigationStyle:”round”,

navigationHAlign:”center”,
navigationVAlign:”bottom”,
navigationHOffset:0,
navigationVOffset:20,

soloArrowLeftHalign:”left”,
soloArrowLeftValign:”center”,
soloArrowLeftHOffset:20,
soloArrowLeftVOffset:0,

soloArrowRightHalign:”right”,
soloArrowRightValign:”center”,
soloArrowRightHOffset:20,
soloArrowRightVOffset:0,
touchenabled:”on”,
onHoverStop:”on”,

navOffsetHorizontal:0,
navOffsetVertical:20,

hideCaptionAtLimit:420,
hideAllCaptionAtLilmit:0,
hideSliderAtLimit:0,

stopAtSlide:-1,
stopAfterLoops:-1,

shadow:0,
fullWidth:”off” ,
fullScreen:”off”,

});

//superfish
jQuery(‘#top-menu ul’).superfish({
hoverClass: ‘over’,
delay: 500,
animation: {height:’show’},
speed: 160,
disableHI: true,
autoArrows: false
});
jQuery(‘#section-menu ul’).superfish({
hoverClass: ‘over’,
delay: 300,
speed: 100,
disableHI: true,
autoArrows: false
});
jQuery(‘#sub-menu ul’).superfish({
hoverClass: ‘over’,
delay: 500,
animation: {height:’show’},
speed: 160,
disableHI: true,
autoArrows: false
});
jQuery(‘.bar-selector ul’).superfish({
hoverClass: ‘over’,
delay: 400,
animation: {height:’show’},
speed: 100,
disableHI: true,
autoArrows: false
});

//hide scrollers until fully loaded
jQuery(‘.bar-slider’).show();
jQuery(‘#steam’).show();

//simplyscroll sliders (standard carousel for IE8 and opera)
var isIE8 = jQuery.browser.msie && +jQuery.browser.version === 8;
var isOpera = jQuery.browser.opera;
//if ( isIE8 || isOpera ) {
if ( isIE8 ) {
jQuery(‘#top-ten-slider’).wrapInner(‘