Samsung 4K TV Comparison Sony 4K TV Comparison Technology

Sony X750F vs Samsung NU7100 (KD55X750F vs UN55NU71000, KD65X750F vs UN65NU7100)

Sony X750F vs Samsung NU7100

Sony X750F vs Samsung NU7100

Sony X750F and Samsung NU7100 are the entry degree TV of 2018 lineup from every of their model.  Because the entry degree, there are usually not many options provided and their image high quality definitely is inferior to the collection above them, however then again, they provide a profit of their worth. However, for his or her worth vary, image high quality and efficiency provided by them are good. Out there, Samsung NU71000 is available in a number of display sizes choices, for the smallest is 40 inch as much as the most important is 75 inch, whereas X750F solely is available in 2 display measurement choice, these are 55 inch (KD55X750F) and 65 Inch (KD65X750F). With the identical display (UN65NU7100 vs KD65X750F, UN55NU7100 vs KD55X750F), Sony X750F is priced tons of greenback costlier than NU7100. So, what options and efficiency provided by every and which is a more sensible choice between them?

Samsung NU7100 vs Sony X750F Key Specs

Specs and Options Sony X750F Samsung NU7100 Measurement Obtainable 55 Inch (KD55X750F), 65 Inch (KD65X750F) 40 Inch (UN40 NU7100), 43 Inch (UN43 NU7100), 50 Inch (UN50 NU7100), 55 Inch (UN55 NU7100), 65 Inch (UN65 NU7100), 75 Inch (UN75 NU7100) Decision 4K (2160 x 3840) 4K (2160 x 3840) Display Sort Flat Flat Panel Sort 55 Inch = IPS Panel, 65 inch = VA Panel VA panel Backlighting Direct LED Edge Lit Native Dimming No No HDR Codecs HDR 10 and HLG HDR 10, HLG, and HDR10+ Shade Know-how Stay Colour Know-how PurColor Different Options Dynamic Distinction Enhancer, 4K Actuality Professional UHD Dimming, Distinction Enhancer, UHD UP-scaling Engine Movement Readability Know-how MotionFlow XR240 Movement Price 120 Refresh Fee Native 60 Hz Native 60 Hz Sensible TV Android TVs Tizen 2018 Processor Undefined Quad Core Sensible Options ChromeCast, MiraCast, Google Assistant, and so on Samsung’s Bixby, Sensible Issues, Net Browser Distant Primary Distant Primary Distant (TM1240A) Audio Channel 2.zero 2.zero Sound Output 20 Watts 20 Watts HDMI Four three USB three 2 Worth See the worth on Amazon See the worth on Amazon

Options and Know-how of Sony X750F and Samsung NU7100

Panel Know-how

Like most fashions of Samsung’s 2018 TV lineup, Samsung NU7100 additionally makes use of VA panel know-how. Using IPS panel makes NU7100 has robust native distinction ratio and may produce deep black degree that definitely additionally makes its efficiency in a darkish room can also be excellent. However in any other case, this makes its aspect viewing angle protection is poor. However, Sony X750F makes use of totally different panel know-how for every of their display sizes.  For its 55 inch mannequin (KD55X750F, it makes use of IPS panel whereas for 65 inch (KD65X750F), it makes use of VA panel. Because it makes use of totally different panel know-how for every of their display sizes, this comparability refers to its 55 inch (KD55X750F) that makes use of IPS panel.  And naturally, using IPS panel makes Sony X750F has good aspect viewing angle protection. However then again, this makes it can’t produce deep black that makes its efficiency in a darkish room shouldn’t be so good. Moreover, each of them additionally use totally different backlight know-how. For this case, Samsung NU7100 makes use of Edge-Lit backlight whereas Sony X750F makes use of Direct LED backlight. And none of them which have native dimming know-how.

HDR Know-how

Each Sony X750F and Samsung NU7100 might equally help HDR, however for this case, NU7100 helps a bit extra HDR codecs than X750F. Along with HDR10 and HLG format, NU7100 additionally already helps HDR10+, a brand new HDR format developed by Samsung and its alliance. Primarily, HDR10+ is predicated on commonplace HDR10, but when normal HDR 10 makes use of static metadata for remapping colour and brightness vary, HDR10+ already makes use of dynamic metadata.  However, Sony X750F solely helps HDR10 and HLG solely, however for HLG, it want a firmware replace.

Movement Dealing with Know-how

For dealing with movement, Samsung NU7100 is powered by Movement Fee 120 know-how whereas Sony X750F is powered by Movement Move XR240 know-how. Besides, primarily, each of those applied sciences are based mostly on the identical native refresh price panel, that’s 60 Hz. Which is a greater, this additionally is determined by their pixel response time.

Sensible TV

As we see on comparability desk above, Samsung NU7100 is that includes Tizen 2018 as its sensible TV platform whereas Sony X750F is that includes Google Android TV 7.zero or Nougat. Each of them equally have quite a few of inbuilt apps which supply engaging sensible TV expertise. The prevalence of X750F, as their controller, Sony X750F is provided with sensible distant that has a whole lot of sensible options together with voice navigation whereas NU7100 is simply outfitted with primary distant.

Connectivity

As their main connectivity, Sony X750F has a bit extra HDMI ports than NU7100. It has Four ports whereas solely Samsung NU7100 solely has three ports. Besides, all HDMI ports of NU7100DMI 2.zero Full Bandwidth, whereas HDMI ports of X750F which help HDMI 2.zero is just 2 ports these are HDMI and HDMI three. All of their HDMI ports already help HDCP 2.2 and CEC. Moreover, X750F additionally has a bit extra USB ports than X750F. It has three ports the place 2 ports is USB 2.zero and 1 port is USB three.zero (USB 1). In the meantime, X750F has 2 ports the place all of them are USB 2.zero. Along with USB ports, they’re additionally outfitted with 1 Composite In (AV In), Element In, RF In, Ethernet, and 1 Digital Audio Out (Optical). Particular for X750F, it additionally has 1 Analog Audio Out (Mini jack) and 1 IR In for its IR Blaster.

Speaker System

Each Sony X750F and Samsung NU7100 equally outfitted with primary 2.zero channel speaker system with 20 watts of complete sound output.  There usually are not inbuilt woofer behind them.

>> Please click on right here to see the worth of Sony X750F on Amazon <<

>> Please click on right here to see the worth of Samsung NU7100 on Amazon <<

Samsung NU7100 vs Sony X750F Efficiency

Image High quality

Distinction and Black Degree

As we’ve got talked about above, since Samsung NU7100 makes use of VA panel know-how, this makes it has wonderful native distinction ratio. Its native distinction ratio is larger than 5000:1, makes it could possibly produce deep black degree. Moreover, NU7100 additionally has wonderful black uniformity. By combing these two elements, this definitely makes its efficiency when utilized in a darkish room is actually wonderful. Blacks look actually darkish that definitely makes darkish scene seems to be wonderful. Moreover, when enjoying HDR photographs, deep black degree produced by NU7100 can also be darkish sufficient to makes shadow particulars of HDR photographs displayed on its display seems to be wonderful just like the creator meant. With its wonderful efficiency in producing deep black, this makes it’s as a very good entry degree TV for watching films with a whole lot of darkish scene. Then again, using IPS panel (particular for KD55X750F) makes its native distinction ratio is just too low, decrease than 1000:1. The outcome, it can’t produce deep black. When set in a darkish setting, black produced even will are likely to look gray than actually black that definitely makes darkish scene doesn’t not look so good.  For you who like watch films in a darkish films, this TV definitely is just not a sensible choice for you. Besides, particular for its 65 inch mannequin (KD65X750F), we have now heard a report that it makes use of VA panel. We anticipate it has comparable efficiency to NU7100 in producing deep black.

Winner: NU7100

Peak Brightness

Whereas in producing black, Samsung NU7100 is superior, in producing peak brightness, Sony X750F is a bit superior. With SDR pictures, their peak brightness is equally brighter than 300 nits, brilliant sufficient to struggle the glare when they’re utilized in shiny setting.  However that is just for a dim-lit or reasonably vibrant room. In the meantime, for a really shiny room, their peak brightness is definitely shouldn’t be vibrant sufficient.  This implies, so long as you don’t use them in a really shiny room like outside or a room with sunny window, the image displayed on their display look pretty vibrant. Similar as not having native dimming, the height brightness of X750F seems to be constant in any measurement of space. However for NU7100, its peak brightness in very small space dims to under 200 nits, makes small spotlight of pictures displayed on its display look too dim. In the meantime, with HDR sign, peak brightness of X750F is a bit elevated whereas peak brightness of NU7100 is probably going fixed. Like with SDR sign, Sony X750F could make its brightness constant at any home windows sizes, whereas on NU7100, its peak brightness in small window sizes is just too dim. General, X750F can present HDR pictures brighter than NU7100. However, since their peak brightness continues to be removed from 1000 nits, you’ll not get numerous profit provided by HDR content material. As we all know, to point out HDR pictures just like the creator meant, a HDR TV ought to have a minimum of 1000 nits of peak brightness.

Winner: X750F

Shade Copy

10 bit vs 8 Bit Depth of color

Each Samsung NU7100 and Sony X750F are equally not help broad colour gamut. The colour protection of each is just ok to cowl colours in Rec.709 of SDR photographs. Whereas for masking colour in DCI P3 that required by HDR pictures, its colour gamut is just not extensive sufficient. However, for an entry degree TV, their shade gamut might be stated properly. Each of them equally can cowl round 80% of DCI P3 shade areas, makes most colours of HDR photographs could be proven pretty correct. Besides, since their shade gamut just isn’t as extensive as larger fashions, each of them can’t present some sure colours like inexperienced or purple nearly as good as greater fashions which have wider colour gamut. However, their shade quantity can also be comparable and in addition not so good. Since they don’t have extensive colour gamut, they will produce deep darks colours and saturated brilliant colours. In the meantime, in time period of shade gradient, each of them equally have good colour gradient. Though some little imperfections may be nonetheless seen in some sure colours, however general, their colour gradient is sweet and look clean, notably when they’re displaying HDR pictures. General, for an entry degree TV, their shade copy nonetheless could be stated good. In the meantime, examine between them, the colour copy of X750F is a bit higher than NU7100.

Winner: X750F

Aspect Viewing Angle

g

 

As we have now talked about above, using IPS panel might make Sony X750F can’t produce deep black, however then again, this makes it has good viewing angle protection, higher than NU7100 that makes use of VA panel, notably in keep black. On the display of NU7100, black will look degraded began at lower than 15 levels off middle and entrance, whereas on the display of X750F, black produced will look constant even when seen from extraordinarily extensive angle.  In the meantime, in keep colours and brightness, though not too vital, efficiency of X750F can also be a bit higher than NU7100. The outcome, when seen from the aspect, the image displayed on the display of X750F appears extra constant than NU7100. And for you who typically watch TV with a gaggle of your loved ones, X750F could also be a more sensible choice for you. However as we have now talked about, this check with its 55 Inch mannequin (KD55X750F) that makes use of IPS panel, whereas for its 6 inch mannequin (KD65X750F) that makes use of VA panel, its efficiency shouldn’t be far totally different to Samsung NU7100.

Winner: X750F

Movement Dealing with

pixel response time

As we all know, one of many necessary elements that required in dealing with movement blur is concerning the response time of the pixel. For this case, the pixel response time of Sony X750F is quicker than Samsung NU7100. The outcome, when they’re enjoying fast paced photographs like sports activities, quick video games, or quick films, on the display of X850F, there’s solely a brief ghosting path following fast paced object that definitely makes the image produced appears clean. However, since its pixel response time shouldn’t be as little as X750F, on the display of NU7100, the ghosting path following fast paced object appears longer that definitely makes the image produced shouldn’t be as clean as displayed on the display of X750F. Besides, general, efficiency of NU7100 in dealing with movement path is sweet. In the meantime, blur that could be seen on their display is extra due than persistence than pixel response time. In the meantime for dimming their backlight, Samsung NU7100 makes use of PWM dimming system with 240 Hz dimming frequency. It will make backlight flicker is seen, particularly for the individuals who delicate to flicker. Then again, Sony X750F doesn’t use PWM system, makes its display is flicker-free.  In the meantime, for minimizing blur that prompted vy persistence, each of them have an choice 60 Hz BFI (Black Body Insertion mode) that may sparkles the backlight at 60 Hz. By activating this mode, this can assist clear-up the movement notably when they’re enjoying 60 fps content material like sports activities or video video games. However however, it will make backlight flicker is extra noticeable. For you who don’t really feel snug with flicker, you don’t have to activate this mode.

Winner: X750F

Enter Lags

General, Samsung NU7100 has a lot better enter lags than Sony X750F. In recreation and PC Mode, regardless of the decision of the inputs, whether or not it’s 4K or 1080p, with out HDR or with HDR, the enter lags of NU7100 is round 15 ms and even decrease. Its enter lags is even together with one of the best in 2018  The end result, enjoying recreation on NU7100 will really feel snug and responsive, even for quick paced video games that require quick reflexes. In the meantime, the enter lags of Sony X750F could also be not as little as NU7100 that’s between 30 ms – 40 ms. This truly continues to be low sufficient for enjoying video games even for quick paced video games. However in fact, this won’t really feel as responsive as on NU7100, notably if you end up enjoying quick paced video games.

Winner: NU7100

Sensible TV Expertise

Tizen 2018 vs Android TV 7.0

As we’ve got mentioned above, as their sensible TV platform, Sony X750F is that includes Google Android TV 7.zero model or Android Nougat whereas Samsung NU7100 is that includes Tizen 2018. Each of those platforms even have intuitive TV interface, however for this case, in navigating, Tizen OS is easier and simpler than Android 7.zero. However in any other case, though each of the platforms additionally equally have quite a few built-in apps like YouTube, Netflix, Amazon, Net Browser, Stay TV, and extra, however concerning the downloadable apps that offered by their apps retailer, Android TV has a whole lot of increasingly more full apps. As we all know, with Google Play Retailer as its apps retailer that supported by tons of developer, it offers hundreds apps, video games, contents, and others. Then again, though not as many as what offered by Samsung apps retailer because the app retailer of Tizen OZ, what offered by it are additionally nonetheless extra full than apps retailer from different platform like WebOS.  Moreover, if options and apps offered by Sony X750F are just like the collection above, Samsung NU7100 lacks some sensible options discovered on the collection above like Sensible Issues, Voice navigation, and sensible distant.  On different phrases, in the event you can take pleasure in full options provided by Android TV with X750F, with NU7100, you possibly can solely take pleasure in primary expertise provided by Tizen OS.

Winner: X750F

>> Please click on right here to examine the newest worth of Sony X750F on Amazon <<

>> Please click on right here to verify the newest worth of Samsung NU7100 on Amazon <<

Abstract

Efficiency Sony X750F Samsung NU7100 Colour Gamut (three.5/5) (three.Four/5) Distinction (three/5) (Four.5/5) Peak Brightness (three.2/5) (2.9/5) HDR Efficiency (three.three/5) (three.7/5) Viewing Angle (three.Four/5) (2.three/5) Movement Dealing with (Four.1/5) (three.6/5) Enter Lag (Four.1/5) (Four.eight/5) UHD Up-scaling (Four.Four/5) (Four.Four/5) Sensible TV (Four/5) (three.7/5) Audio Efficiency (2.eight/5) (three.three/5)

Conclusion

General, for an entry degree, what provided by Samsung NU7100 Sony X750F is pretty good, makes them nearly as good efficiency for combined utilization. Besides, since every of them has benefits and drawbacks than the opposite, for particular utilization, every of them is best than the opposite.

For watching films

To current the texture of a like in cinema when watching films, most individuals want to observe films in a darkish room. For this case, Samsung NU7100 is best than Sony X750F as a result of it has deeper black degree and higher black uniformity.  As we now have talked about above, since X750F can’t produce deep darkish, efficiency of X750F when used for watching films in a darkish room shouldn’t be so good, notably for films with numerous darkish scene like horror or thriller.

For Watching Sports activities

In contrast to when watching films the place most individuals want in a darkish room, when watching sports activities, most individuals often favor in a shiny room with a gaggle of good friend or household. Moreover, since most sports activities have numerous quick scene, the power of a TV in dealing with movement blur can also be essential. And for this case, Sony X750F is best than NU7100. Though in a brilliant room, their image high quality is nearly comparable, however X750F has higher movement dealing with and wider viewing angle protection than NU7100. That is that brought on X750F is best when used for watching sports activities.

For Enjoying Video games

Along with image high quality and movement dealing with, the enter lag of a TV can also be essential features that ought to be thought-about when used for enjoying video games. Moreover, for you who typically play video games with a gaggle of your good friend or household, you also needs to think about their viewing angle protection. And between them, which is best when used for enjoying video games, this is determined by the way you play video games. Should you play video games simply to have enjoyable with your mates or household, X750F definitely is a more sensible choice for you. Besides, for those who a gamer, NU7100 definitely is a more sensible choice for you due it has decrease enter lags.

For Watching TV Exhibits

Identical to when watching sports activities, most individuals favor to observe TV exhibits like speak present, music present, and others in a vibrant room and with a gaggle of household. And for this case, X750F is best because it has broad viewing angle protection than NU7100. That is very helpful once you watch TV exhibits with your loved ones that sit on the large seating.

HDR Expertise

Each Samsung NU7100 and Sony X750F might already helps HDR, however when used for watching HDR, their efficiency continues to be removed from the expectation. This implies, though you play HDR contents on these TVs, however you’ll not get a number of advantages provided by HDR its self.  That is induced most of show specs provided by them are nonetheless removed from that really helpful.  However, for those who simply need to take pleasure in HDR expertise, NU7100 is a greater. That is due NU7100 has deep black degree that permits it could actually present shadow particulars of HDR pictures much better than X750F.

>> Please click on right here to purchase Samsung NU7100 on Amazon <<

>> Please click on right here to purchase Sony X750F on Amazon <<

jQuery.noConflict();

“use strict”;

//DOCUMENT.READY
jQuery(doc).prepared(perform()
//cover numerous jQuery parts till they’re loaded
jQuery(‘.revolution-slider ul’).present();
jQuery(‘.it-widget-tabs’).present();
//revolution slider

if (jQuery.fn.cssOriginal!=undefined)
jQuery.fn.css = jQuery.fn.cssOriginal;

jQuery(‘.revolution-slider’).revolution(

delay:8000,
startheight:348,
startwidth:672,

hideThumbs:200,

thumbWidth:100,
thumbHeight:50,
thumbAmount:5,

navigationType:”none”,
navigationArrows:”solo”,
navigationStyle:”round”,

navigationHAlign:”center”,
navigationVAlign:”bottom”,
navigationHOffset:zero,
navigationVOffset:20,

soloArrowLeftHalign:”left”,
soloArrowLeftValign:”center”,
soloArrowLeftHOffset:20,
soloArrowLeftVOffset:zero,

soloArrowRightHalign:”right”,
soloArrowRightValign:”center”,
soloArrowRightHOffset:20,
soloArrowRightVOffset:zero,
touchenabled:”on”,
onHoverStop:”on”,

navOffsetHorizontal:zero,
navOffsetVertical:20,

hideCaptionAtLimit:420,
hideAllCaptionAtLilmit:zero,
hideSliderAtLimit:zero,

stopAtSlide:-1,
stopAfterLoops:-1,

shadow:zero,
fullWidth:”off” ,
fullScreen:”off”,

);

//superfish
jQuery(‘#top-menu ul’).superfish(
hoverClass: ‘over’,
delay: 500,
animation: peak:’present’,
velocity: 160,
disableHI: true,
autoArrows: false
);
jQuery(‘#section-menu ul’).superfish(
hoverClass: ‘over’,
delay: 300,
velocity: 100,
disableHI: true,
autoArrows: false
);
jQuery(‘#sub-menu ul’).superfish(
hoverClass: ‘over’,
delay: 500,
animation: peak:’present’,
velocity: 160,
disableHI: true,
autoArrows: false
);
jQuery(‘.bar-selector ul’).superfish(
hoverClass: ‘over’,
delay: 400,
animation: peak:’present’,
velocity: 100,
disableHI: true,
autoArrows: false
);

//cover scrollers till absolutely loaded
jQuery(‘.bar-slider’).present();
jQuery(‘#steam’).present();

//simplyscroll sliders (normal carousel for IE8 and opera)
var isIE8 = jQuery.browser.msie && +jQuery.browser.model === eight;
var isOpera = jQuery.browser.opera;
//if ( isIE8 || isOpera )
if ( isIE8 )
jQuery(‘#top-ten-slider’).wrapInner(‘